← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/45502/2021allowed

Ranju Gilhotra v. State Of Haryana

2022-09-29Mr. Justice Karamjit Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-45502-2021 Date of Decision:-29.09.2022 RANJU GILHOTRA ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA ... Respondent(s) -.-

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KARAMJIT SINGH -.- Present:- Mr. Sunil Chadha, Senior Advocate with Mr. Saurav Kanojia, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Naveen Kumar Sheoran, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Karan Pathak, Advocate for the complainant.

-.- KARAMJIT SINGH , J. (Oral) Prayer is for grant of anticipatory bail in case having FIR No.495 dated 13.10.2021 registered under Sections 406, 420, 506, 120-B IPC at Police Station Thanesar Sadar District Kurukshetra. The report submitted by the Mediator with regard to compromise, which has been effected between the parties has been received and the same is taken on record.

PUNEET CHAWLA 2022.09.30 14:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

( 2 ) CRM-M-45502-2021 The counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter has already been compromised between the parties and the petitioner has joined investigation with the police by virtue of order dated 3.11.2021 passed by this Court.

The State counsel on instructions from ASI Satish Kumar has not refuted the fact that the matter has been compromised between the parties and further submits that the petitioner who has associated with the investigation is not required by police for further investigation or for custodial interrogation.

The counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant has admitted the fact of compromise effected between the parties and further pleaded no objection if the present petition is allowed. In view of the above, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is hereby allowed and order dated 3.11.2021 is hereby made absolute. The petitioner should abide by the conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

( KARAMJIT SINGH) 29.09.2022 JUDGE Gaurav Sorot Whether reasoned / speaking?

Yes / No Whether reportable?

Yes / No PUNEET CHAWLA 2022.09.30 14:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment