Jasbir Kaur v. State Of Punjab And Others

 
 

  !


    "

#$%  %&'(')*+ ,

#(-'./#0.

%$'$')%.

1%.(0( 2$#$% 0)3#-#)4$5%.( %(6)4%)$(
 

 

   
 

  

     




 



   !

"##"
$%"&'&(
  

  

   ! !"

#
$ %&  

'   ! !"

(  #
$ %   # 
$%"#)*+)"&'&, )   

 * !+ !"

,#
$ &

'    

  %   /
  1  !!* ,   2!!* 3&

 



   '     



  14

5     



 

-     '



73  6 0 )

  

 !8* !"

   -.

/

0   -.

1

3   ! ! !9

% 5    

   (

 '

 6 73  6 0 )

  -. 4 5

06!3

'  !!* 

   

  6 '  :     

"

)        

        ) 6-

  



    

     14

' 

: 

    - 

        

0  )

+ . : '

'

'   

   6 :  -



73  6 0 )

  -. 4 5

06!3 '



'    



;   "

   6

 $ "24. Before parting with the case at hand, we must clarify the observations made vide the impugned order qua the

competency of the Tribunal to hand over possession of the property. In S. Vanitha (supra), this Court observed that Tribunals under the Act may order eviction if it is necessary and expedient to ensure the protection of the senior citizen. Therefore, it cannot be said that the Tribunals constituted under the Act, while exercising jurisdiction under Section 23, cannot order possession to be transferred. This would defeat the purpose and object of the Act, which is to provide speedy, simple and inexpensive remedies for the elderly."

* <

 '

      '  * !+ !"

,#
$ &

 

 

 - $ 

.

     

  6

 '

(

 '

  73  6 0 )

  -. 4 5

06!

  1 

    

'  6  '





   



  - 

    

   6   -

) 





 '   1 :   ( 

=


'

 6



   

-    

#)0#.7+8 ,  2 22 kanchan

  Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No