Meenu Yadav v. State Of Haryana And ORS

In The High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh CRM-M-41532-2020 (O&M) Date of Decision:-10.12.2020 Meenu Yadav ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL Present:- Ms. Gurmeet Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner. (proceedings conducted through video conferencing) ***** GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that despite FIR No.501 dated 24.9.2020 at Police Station City Mahendergarh under Section 67-A of The Information Technology Act, 2000 and Sections 34, 354-A, 379-A and 506 of Indian Penal Code having been lodged at the instance of the petitioner in the month of September, 2020, the police has not taken any action and has not even arrested any of the accused. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and while refraining from making any expression as regards averments made in the petition, the same is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-The Superintendent of Police, Mahendergarh to ensure that the matter in question PANKAJ KAKKAR 2020.12.10 18:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

( 2 ) CRM-M-41532-2020 (O&M) is got investigated expeditiously and fairly in accordance with law, so that a final report be submitted thereafter at the earliest. The present petition stands disposed of accordingly. 10.12.2020 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) pankaj Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No PANKAJ KAKKAR 2020.12.10 18:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document