Venkateswaran Subramanian And ORS v. Ut Of Chandigarh And ANR

In The High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh CRM-M-38517-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 10.12.2024 Venkateswaran Subramanian and others ... Petitioners

Versus

U.T. Chandigarh and another ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL Present:- Ms. Livleen Brar, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Ankur Bali, APP, U.T. Chandigarh.

Mr. Rahul Bhargava, Advocate with Mr. Pradeep Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ***** GURVINDER SINGH GILL , J . (Oral) 1.

Petitioners-Venkateswaran Subramanian, Salim Abdul Malik Roopani, Abhishek Sharma, Nitin Chaturvedi, Nitin and Anil Bishwanath Malhotra have approached this Court seeking quashing of FIR No.60, dated 02.04.2022, Police Station Industrial Area-I, U.T. Chandigarh under Sections 341, 342, 506, 120-B IPC, and all subsequent proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of a compromise having been effected between the parties. 2.

Vide order dated 09.08.2024, the parties had been directed to appear before the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate so as to get their statements recorded qua the factum of compromise.

MOHAN SINGH 2024.12.10 17:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh

CRM-M-38517-2024 (O&M) - 2 - 3.

Report of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chandigarh, has been received, wherein it has been reported that the statement of petitioners/accused Venkateswaran Subramanian, Salim Abdul Malik Roopani, Abhishek Sharma, Nitin Chaturvedi, Nitin, Anil Bishwanath Malhotra and complainant Puneet Gupta have been recorded to the effect that they have compromised the matter amongst themselves. 4.

Complainant Puneet Gupta in his statement had stated that he has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed. 5.

The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chandigarh, has specifically opined that the parties have entered into compromise voluntarily without there being any pressure, coercion or undue influence. 6.

In view of the aforesaid compromise and bearing in mind the law laid down by Full Bench of this Court in 2007(3) RCR (Crl.) 1052 Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab, the present petition is allowed and FIR No.60, dated 02.04.2022, Police Station Industrial Area-I, U.T. Chandigarh under Sections 341, 342, 506, 120-B IPC, and all subsequent proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed qua the petitioners.

10.12.2024 (GURVINDER SINGH GILL) mohan JUDGE Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No MOHAN SINGH 2024.12.10 17:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh