Chirdeep Chopra @ Rahul v. Anubha Chopra

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH F.A.O. No.1400 of 2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 04, 2016 Chirdeep Chopra@ Rahul ....Appellant versus Anubha Chopra .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT.

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BAJANTHRI.

--- Present: Mr.K.K.Saini, Advocate, for the appellant. -.-

1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The instant appeal has been filed alongwith an application for condonation of delay of 352 days. The order dated 13.02.2015 passed by the learned District Judge, Family Court, Gurgaon is in a petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 whereby the parties dissolved their marriage by mutual consent on the terms and conditions mentioned therein. Since the appellant agreed to the visitation rights given to the respondent to meet their minor son, the difficulty, if any, experienced in complying with that condition can be considered by the Family Court only. No appeal against the consent order is maintainable.

MOHINDER KUMAR 2016.03.16 11:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

FAO No.1400 of 2016 [2] The instant appeal as well as application for condonation of delay are dismissed, however, with liberty mentioned above.

[SURYA KANT] JUDGE March 04, 2016 [P.B.BAJANTHRI] mohinder JUDGE MOHINDER KUMAR 2016.03.16 11:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh