Sonu @ Mundiya v. State Of Haryana

will take a sufficiently long time to conclude and, therefore, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in custody any longer.

4.

Per contra, learned State counsel has opposed the bail application stating that the petitioner is a habitual offender and as per her instructions, as many as 21 cases stand registered against him. 5.

I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties.

6.

The present case pertains to furnishing of fake surety bonds by one Sonu son of Sh. Shishpal, who has already been granted regular bail in this case. The registration of other cases against the petitioner may not be of any relevance in the present case as the present case pertains to furnishing of surety bonds. In any case, the petitioner is in custody since 02.07.2025; the main accused Sonu son of Sh. Shishpal has already been granted regular bail; will take a sufficiently long time to conclude and, therefore, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in custody any longer. 7.

In view of the aforementioned facts and circumstances, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition is

allowed. The petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on his furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate concerned.

Rekha