Nirmal Singh v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.121 CRM-M No.42098 of 2022 Date of Decision: 14th September, 2022 Nirmal Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

Present:

Mr. Umesh Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

* * * * MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J.

(ORAL) After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition while submitting that the petitioner would surrender before the trial Court concerned within one week positively and would move an application there for seeking the relief of regular bail and he prays that the trial Court be directed to decide the bail application of the petitioner within some specific time frame. Mr. Arun Gupta, learned Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, who has appeared in this case in pursuance of the copy of the present petition having been sent to the respondent-State in advance, has no objection to the afore-discussed submission as well as the prayer as made by learned counsel for the petitioner.

Resultantly, the petition in hand stands dismissed for having been withdrawn with a direction to the trial Court concerned that in case, the petitioner surrenders before it within the above-stipulated period and moves the application for seeking the relief of regular bail, the same be decided, strictly in accordance with law, in the given set of the facts and circumstances of the case, within a period of three (03) days. 14.09.2022 (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) seema JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No SEEMA SHARMA 2022.09.15 13:28 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment