← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/40183/2023allowed

Raminderjeet Singh v. State Of Punjab And Another

2023-09-20Mrs. Justice Manjari Nehru Kaul2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH 2023:PHHC:123355 CRM-M-40183-2023 Date of decision: September 20th, 2023 Raminderjeet Singh .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL

Present:

Mr. Gursimran Singh Bhatia, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Banga, Advocate for respondent No.2.

MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the instant petition is for quashing of FIR No.272 dated 11.10.2022 under Sections 457 and 380 of the IPC (Section 411 of the IPC added later on) registered at Police Station Cantonment, District Amritsar, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 04.08.2023 (Annexure P-2).

Vide order dated 17.08.2023 of this Court, the parties were directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate on 29.08.2023 to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise arrived at, between them.

Report has since been received from learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Amritsar, in pursuance of the directions of this Court, wherein, the factum of the compromise arrived at between PUNEET SACHDEVA 2023.09.20 13:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document.

Chandigarh

CRM-M-40183-2023 -2the parties stands verified and confirmed. As per the report compromise has indeed been effected between the parties and the same is without any pressure or coercion and out of their free will and the complainant has also made statement to the effect that he would have no objection if the FIR qua the accused-petitioner is quashed. The trial Court has annexed the copies of the statements of the parties, along with its report.

Learned State counsel too submits that there are no other accused other than the petitioner and respondent No.2 is the only aggrieved person in the FIR in question.

In view of the report of the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Amritsar, and the principles laid down by the Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, and also by the Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the instant petition is allowed. The aforesaid FIR and all consequential proceedings arising out of it, are quashed.

Needless to say the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements recorded before the Court below. September 20th, 2023 (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No PUNEET SACHDEVA 2023.09.20 13:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document.

Chandigarh