Pushpa v. State Of Haryana And Others

2024:PHHC:004871 CWP-23670-2019 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-23670-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: 15.01.2024 Pushpa

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana and others ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present:- Mr. Ranjit Saini, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Ravi Pratap Singh, DAG, Haryana *** TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the issue raised in the petition stands already decided in the petitioner's favour by this Court vide judgment dated 29.04.2019 passed in CWP-22558-2016 titled Suraj Parkash Bajaj v. State of Haryana and others, and also the order passed in review application, RA No.402 of 2019 dated 16.10.2019. Therefore, the second respondent may be directed to decide the petitioner's case on that basis.

2.

Learned State counsel contends that appropriate decision regarding the claim raised in the petition will be taken by the second respondent on the basis of law laid down in the aforesaid judgment within a period of three months.

PAYAL 2024.01.16 11:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

2024:PHHC:004871 CWP-23670-2019 (O&M) -23.

In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. 4.

Ordered accordingly.

5.

Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, as having been rendered infructuous.

(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 15.01.2024 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PAYAL 2024.01.16 11:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment