Sahil v. State Of Haryana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH **** CRM-M-41889-2020 Date of Decision: 22.03.2020 **** SAHIL ..... Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDIP AHLUWALIA
Present:
Mr.Anutej Singh Barnala, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Vishal Malik, DAG, Haryana, for the respondent-State.
SUDIP AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) Ld. State Counsel, on instructions, from A.S.I. Sat Narayan Yadav, submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation in terms of the earlier order dated 15.12.2020, and is not required for custodial interrogation.
For this reason, the interim bail granted to the petitioner earlier, is, hereby, confirmed.
Disposed off.
22.03.2021 (SUDIP AHLUWALIA) Neelam JUDGE
1. Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
2. Whether reportable:
Yes/No NEELAM 2021.03.22 19:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document