Vanita Rose v. State Of Haryana & ORS
YOGESH SHARMA 2019.09.23 13:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-5171-2017 (O&M) 101-1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CWP-5171-2017 (O&M) Date of decision : 20.09.2019 Vanita Rose ... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and another ... Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present:
Mr. S.K. Nehra, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. R.K. Doon, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. Anurag Goyal, Advocate for respondent No.2.
**** AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous as petitioner has already challenged the selection process in CWP No.16643 of 2017 and the same may be disposed of as such.
Ordered accordingly.
( AMIT RAWAL ) JUDGE 20.09.2019 Yogesh Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No