Raghbir Singh v. Sahil And ORS
!"
# $% & '
('
!"
$!)!*)+ , ) & '
('
& -. /'
/ / /
!
""""
/ /
'
#
$
% #& ## '(#& )
*+$!
,$!
, + !
#--
#.//
+ +
0 + %) + 1
% # &- 2((01 % 34 25
!+
!
+
!
%
! '& (2 '(#(
'
! +
6! !+ + %) $!
6! !
7 )
//// .
/./ / &
$ !
+ 1
+!
) $!
%
$ )
%
+
%
!
% + ) !%) +!
+ ) $!
) 9 ! ) +
: !
!% %
/.
.0 / -
9 ; !
+ *! Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and Another 1
( /*3$ , !*$ # # 4 % % + + + !
1 <30
!"#$
%# !"&$
&' !"($
31)
* (+,
-
$ . /
*
32
(+,
(+,
* * * * * * 42. )
&$ 0
1 $ !2 !(%+ %!%(
$
3 !4%' #+
3 !'#!#(
3 !(#'&+
3 !&
&!&(
3 !#&'(+
3 !!(!((
3 5(''+
3 4'!'(
3 (''4+
9 ; !
+*! National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors. 1
2 / 4 %!
#-- #-&1 #-/
#.// % 1 !
= + +! > +! > *
) +! > !
+) !+ !
= % > ? @!! % + A> 1+ ) =) $ A!+ !
!
1 <52. 6 conventional heads
7/
8*
7 %(+++
7 !+++++
7 !+++++
7/
0 9
:
6
;
*
7 !(+++ &++++ 7 !(+++
<
)
!+,
)
= = = = = 59.3)
(+,
/
&+
#+,
&+(+
*
(+'+
!(, 6
59.4*
$
&+,
&+
6 %(,
&+(+
!+,
(+'+
59.5.
#+#%0> ?
59.6.
0> @ &%/
59.7
59.87
7
!(+++7 &++++ 7 !(+++
!+,
A
/ 9 ; !
+ *! 7,
) $ )#*$ )+ !,3 )9 .:,: ;
<#'
)* ,
8:
# =*=$* ,
= $# 6 6 / 5 / $8
< $, #*3$ $ ) / =:
/*3$ % !+
+ !
!
1 B216 <
C 0 8
;
*
D D
D D D
D D D
)
%!! Spousal consortium
D
/ D %!% Parental consortium
D
D %!# Filial consortium
6
22
3 /
E
3 /
23 3>
6
*
C
6 6
( 24
D
D C 0 8*
7 &++++
.
! % %
=+)8/) +
%!%
@! $!
)
+ 1 % % +
$ + +
+
#(
$*! FAO-1292-2006Jasbir Singh and another vs. Surjit Singh and others decided on 08.11.2024 %
+ !% !
1 B2 *
F
*
* /
G /H
7 5+++"
##
:
Jasbir Singh's (supra)
+ !% % .(((01 + 9%
! )'(#( * !!
A! = !% %!A!
+ @!+
! ++7
!
! +
+ + 9 ) !
+)!
%! !
= ! ! + +7
#'
:
! *!
+ #' >
3 $ ,!) =
#&
! ! %% $!
% + 0! % : % !
+ )! % ;
+
+ A!+ 9 ; !
+
! Malakappa vs The Iffco Tokio General Insurance, 2025 INSC B4
!"#
However, we are of the opinion that since there was no employment specified of the husband, it cannot be assumed that he would not have been at least partially dependent on the income of the deceased.
&
!"&A
#8
:
% A!+ *!
+ 0
+ %
#2
! % !% +!
%% % !! $!
+! +% +
% #-
+!
!
!
= !
% % $ %6! !
*!
./ #4
:
% %% )9 ; !
+*! A!+
% $% #& ## '(#& )
*+$!
+
) $
1 +
+!
+
! +1!
1 Sr.
No.
Heads Compensation Awarded # ):
+ #((((01 '
@!! 3'25 '2((01#((((B'25 & !
% = !#0& 8#-401#'2((B#0&
$:
+ /&&&01#'2((18#-4 ! #& -
!
) #'
..
.8//&&&B#'B#& C ? #/ #2(01 / @!
?= #/ #2(01 .
C * !+ C
8/ 8((01
!
!,3 )# :!) #'5>6>26?
;*+ :!)
+!
%)$!
#'>52>
? )= )+ ;
,!*) #' >6>6?
562652
#/
)9 ; !
+ *! Dara Singh @ Dhara Banjara Vs. Shyam Singh Varma ( 52 R.Valli and Others VS. Tamil Nandu State Transport Corporation
/*3$ , !*$ # # >
1 + 3.5
!+
+!
+ +
+ D
#.
)
+!
+ % %$!
% % + + ) A!+ $ $!
! !
+!
+
%
!
+ 0
) $!
% $ + 0
! 7
!
$!
'(
)
'
('
/ / E!
F 7 0 1 7 7 F G