Sonika Bansal @ Sonika Talwar v. State Of Punjab And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.113 CRWP No.10630 of 2021 Date of Decision: 10.11.2021 Sonika Bansal @ Sonika Talwar

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

Present:

Mr. Arjun Veer Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

* * * * MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J.

(ORAL) After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition while submitting that the petitioner would be availing the appropriate efficacious remedy, as may be permissible to her under law, for seeking the redressal of her grievance, as canvassed in this petition.

Mr. Sukhbeer Singh, learned Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, who has appeared on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4 in this case in pursuance of the copies of the present petition having been sent to the respondent-State in advance, has no objection for the same. Resultantly, the petition in hand stands dismissed for having been withdrawn accordingly.

(MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) 10.11.2021 JUDGE neetu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No NEETU RANI 2021.11.10 16:29 I attest to the accuracy of this order PHHC