Dinkar Dogra v. Union Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP No.5450 of 2017 Date of decision: 30.03.2017 Dinkar Dogra ....Petitioner

Versus

Union of India

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN Present: - Mr. Anoop Verma, Advocate, for Ms. Jigyasa Tanwar, Advocate, for the petitioner. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL) This writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been filed for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of 2nd proviso to Section 18 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 for being unreasonable, unjust, ambiguous, against the principles of natural justice and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. 2.

After arguing for some time, when the Bench was not agreeing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may be allowed to withdraw this petition.

3.

Dismissed as withdrawn.

(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (RAMENDRA JAIN) March 30, 2017 JUDGE R.S.

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Ravinder Singh 2017.04.03 11:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document