M/S Rajeev Kumar v. State Of Haryana And ORS

CWP No.30939 of 2018(O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.30939 of 2018(O&M) Date of Decision:14.03.2022 M/s Rajeev Kumar ......Petitioner Vs State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH Present:None for the petitioner.

Mr. Vivek Chauhan, Addl., A.G., Haryana.

Mr. Sunil Dhanda, Advocate for Mr. Deepak Manchanda, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4.

**** RAJ MOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) This writ petition came up for hearing in due course on 27.02.2020 and following order was passed:- "Learned counsel for respondents no.2 to 4 submits that this petition is rendered infructuous as the entire amount due towards the petitioner has since been deposited.

As there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, adjourned to 02.03.2022.

27.02.2020 (LISA GILL) Sunil JUDGE"

Today, also there is no representation on behalf of the PRINCE SAINI 2022.03.15 14:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP No.30939 of 2018(O&M)  petitioner.

Learned counsel for respondents No.2 to 4 submits that entire due amount has already been released in favour of the petitioner and this writ petition has become infructuous. In view of facts and circumstances of the case, no bona fide purpose would be served by keeping the present petition pending.

Dismissed as having rendered infructuous.

Since, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, liberty is granted to the petitioner that in case, the statement of fact made by respondents No.2 to 4 is ultimately found to be untrue, the petitioner may move an appropriate application for revival of the writ petition. (RAJ MOHAN SINGH) 14.03.2022 JUDGE Prince Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PRINCE SAINI 2022.03.15 14:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document