Sham Sunder v. Union Of India And Others

CWP-22868-2024 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-22868-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.01.2025 Sham Sunder ....Petitioner

Versus

Union of India and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSH BUNGER Present :

Mr. Sakal Sikri, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ritik Mohindroo, Advocate for Ms. Ruchita Garg, Advocate for the respondent(s)-Union of India.

*** HARSH BUNGER, J. (Oral) The instant Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India inter alia seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus for directing the respondents-authorities to renew the passport of the petitioner.

2.

At the outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent(s)-Union of India submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous as the passport of the petitioner stands renewed. 3.

In view of the statement made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent(s)-Union of India, the present petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.

4.

All pending application(s), if any, shall also stand closed. 14.01.2025 (HARSH BUNGER) Himani JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No HIMANI GUPTA 2025.01.16 09:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh