Suraj Mukh v. Ramesh Kumar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CR-4644-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision : 04.03.2025 SURAJ MUKH .... Petitioner

VERSUS

RAMESH KUMAR .... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present :

None for the petitioner.

Mr. Abhimanyu Batra, Advocate for the respondent. ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL) 1.

On 25.02.2025 the following order was passed : 'Mr. Shantanu Singh Batra, Advocate has appeared and has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of the respondent which is taken on record.

Learned counsel for the respondent has pointed out that the execution since stands satisfied vide order dated 30.11.2023.

None has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner today. In the interest of justice, adjourned to 04.03.2025.

To be shown in the urgent list'.

AMAN JAIN 2025.03.05 09:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment

CR-4644-2023 (O&M) -22.

Today none has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present revision petition.

3.

In view thereof, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present revision petition for non-prosecution. 4.

Dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.

04.03.2025 (ALKA SARIN) Aman Jain JUDGE NOTE:

Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: Yes/No AMAN JAIN 2025.03.05 09:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment