Vinod Kumar And Others v. State Of Haryana And Others

CWP-18844-2025 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-18844-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.07.2025 VINOD KUMAR AND OTHERS . . . . Petitioners Vs.

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS . . . . Respondents **** CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA ****

Present:

Ms. Priya Kaushik, Advocate for Mr. Vikas Chatrath, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Vivek Chauhan, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

**** SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral)

1. Notice of motion.

2. Mr. Vivek Chauhan, Addl. A.G., Haryana accepts notice on behalf of State.

3. Both the counsel are ad idem that the issue stands finally adjudicated by this Court in common order with leading case of Mahabir Singh Tanwar vs. State of Haryana and others, in CWP-14627-2024, decided on 24.04.2025, wherein this Court held as under: "9. We have noticed the aforesaid submissions. However, the same would have no impediment in disposing of all these writ petitions as the claim of the writ petitioners has to be decided finally now in terms of the order passed by the Supreme Court on 20.02.2025 in Miscellaneous application Dairy No.2400 of 2024 in Civil Appeal No.3933 of 2023 with connected miscellaneous MOHIT GOYAL 2025.07.14 13:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-18844-2025 (O&M) applications titled as "Union of India and another versus M. Siddaraj (supra).

10. We, therefore, dispose of all these writ petitions and allow them in the same terms as above and with further directions to the Administration-respondents to pass specific orders taking into consideration the facts of each case. For the said purpose, we allow the State Government to take decision within a period of two months henceforth as all of the petitioners are already retired and their retiral benefits would be accordingly required to be adjusted and released.

11. The State authorities shall also take into consideration any policy decision which the State Government may take with respect to the persons, who retired having put in more than six months and less than one year of service in their last year of tenure.

12. Pending application(s), if any, in all the writ petitions are disposed of accordingly."

4. Present writ petition is disposed of mutatis mutandis.

5. All pending applications also stand disposed of accordingly. (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) JUDGE 10.07.2025 Mohit goyal

1. Whether speaking/reasoned?

Yes/No

2. Whether reportable?

Yes/No MOHIT GOYAL 2025.07.14 13:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document