Parmila Devi v. State Of Haryana And ORS

  
      
  

!"#"

$%&'

('

 )*"+

,"

'''' ""

$ ) - )#.# /

 )0 $

$1 2 )# ''''' #3 $1 $#
4% 56 4' /
 4
 

 

  
 


 





 
   4
 

7 ' 8) +9






!
"
!
##$%##&

 '"

(

"


)

 
"


 *" +



, -, #-#,
."
/&

#

0
"!
" 1
 
 


!

 


"
"
23

+
""

1  #%#- 4

-&%-5 -, #- 4
."
/ 
"


6 +) 2 !

1
7

! 
8 
!

 " 1

!
1
+
-9 #-


)
1   
1
)
"

 

!
'11
 
1


1


9%#- 4

-& -4 #- 4
 
!+


) 
)
-4

- #- 

!

++
 1
1
1


"!1


!
 1

-9 #-#
) "
 
:

 
 
"!
 
!
1
)
!

- -& #-##
) 
!
 
1
 
!

)
"
 
1
!

- -& #-##
." /;



)


:
+
 

1
  +


 
)
 
1


!
 

, -, #-#,

 
+"
 
 

!
!

 


"
23

+ 
 
)+!

!

+
" "

-4 -, #-##
)
 
)
" *"!

!


, -;

#-##
."
/5
+
 

"

! 

 
'"

/.**0 /"$12.

$1 $ 2 ) , )#.# /

 )0 $

$1 2 )#
'<
 #4;,#

#-##
."
/ -
 :"+1

-9 #-#;

!
 
1!!

"
 !

1
+
 

1
*"
) 
 

!
1
""!


)
!
!

 +)
2 !

1
7

! 
8 


" 1 
 
+
 




  

   

 

    
 
 
 




  ,

Learned State counsel has no objection to the limited prayer made and submits that the respondents would not be averse to have a relook at the matter.

& ;

(
)

 
 

) "
11+

 
1
 

 





)



 


 


 



!+ 

 /
:"+1

!
 
!
"
) 


 ,
1 
) 
 
'"




!
 
" 
)"!
 


:"


 !
1
7
+





+





"
!
+
 

 )

!

 

 






 
1
 !!




 

 !!




!+!
 "

84
    .:.# &7

















 <  
+ =% <  
 ! =%