Milakh Raj v. Som Nath And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRR-2435-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.05.2026 Milakh Raj ... Petitioner

Versus

Som Nath and another ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Ms. Gurvir Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner (through V.C.).

Mr. Manu Loona, Advocate for the respondents.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

1.

Seeking setting aside of impugned order dated 23.05.2019 passed by JMIC, Fazilka whereby the application filed by the petitioner for summoning of respondents was rejected, the petitioner has come up before this Court by filing the present revision petition.

2.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has expired. 3.

Counsel for the respondents also does not dispute the aforesaid fact. 4.

Given above, the present petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 27.05.2026 Jyoti Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable:

No JYOTI SHARMA 2026.05.29 10:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh