Sukhdev Singh Kamboj v. State Of Punjab And Another
!"!
#$ % %
&'(& ' %)%% (*"
&+ %%%%%&& $,-%& &
& -.
!" # $% & '( )')$
* $)+ $)$ &', $+ " - . (,'
/ 1".23 4
4 * $), ".
4 - * 5 - I
- - --4
4
--5 - - 5 6
6
7 4
8 # ) 8 - 9
5 )'' 8 6- 4 :4 5 !
# )
9 - 66- 4 # )
5
)')$
# )
;
-5 )')$ 6-
-
!"
- 6 4 $ < 6 # ) 66-
* 6 - ! '% '( )')$ 4 4
85 - 4 4
4 /:
=)3
- ' '( )')$ 8 6- "
6 * * 6 - - )+ '( )')$
4 8 6 * 6 - * 5
..7
4 6 6
6 * 6 - * - ---
# ) 4
- -
7 6
-
>
8 6 4
--
-
8
--4 8 *
* 4
)''
4
)''+ 8-
4 )'
5
!"#$ % &'() **!*+! (%!
*#
, - -
(!.
,, / ",
01234
,
, % 5
!,
,/,,
, , 67 ! -!1 , 8 !
. , -
,,
/
,
9,
,
, '
,
,
, Section 482 Cr.P.C is not an instrument handed over to an accused to short-circuit a prosecution and bring about its sudden death. The inherent power should not be exercised to stifle a legitimate prosecution. High Court being the highest Court of a State should normally refrain from giving a prima facie decision in a case where the entire facts are incomplete and hazy, more so when the evidence has not been collected and produced before the Court and the issues involved, whether factual or legal, are of magnitude and cannot be seen in their true perspective without sufficient material. Thecomplaint/F.I.R. has to be read as a whole. If it appears that on consideration of the allegations in the light of the statement made on oath of the complainant or disclosed in the F.I.R. that the ingredients of the offence or offences are disclosed and there is no material to show that the complaint/F.I.R. is mala fide, frivolous or vexatious, in that event there would be no justification for interference by the High Court. 9.
! -4
66-5 66 -
5
6 - 4 8
? /?@A@ $$@)')$ & '( )')$3 5
5 #
6
B=5 C '
" - .
6 65
4-5 6 -
.
/& -/
% %