Aman Mittal @ Aman William v. State Of Punjab

CRM-M-36254 of 2019 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-36254 of 2019 (O&M) Date of decision : 28.1.2020 ...

Aman Mittal @ Aman William ................Petitioner vs.

State of Punjab .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Madaan ...

Present: Mr. Inderjit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms.Amarjit Kaur Khurana, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.

...

H. S. Madaan, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has since joined the investigation.

Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Jasvir Singh, concedes this fact, further contending that he is not required for custodial interrogation by the local police. The matter is stated to have been compromised between the parties and CRM-M-50205-2019 for quashing of FIR on the basis of compromised is stated to be pending before this Court, fixed for today.

BANITA CHUGH 2020.01.28 15:29 I am the author of this document

CRM-M-36254 of 2019 -2In these circumstances, the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 7.1.2020 is made absolute, subject to fulfillment of following conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.:- i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation, as and when required, by the police; ii)that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; and iii)that the petitioner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court and shall surrender his passport, if any.

The petition in that way is allowed.

( H.S. Madaan ) 28.1.2020 Judge chugh Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No Whether reportable Yes / No BANITA CHUGH 2020.01.28 15:29 I am the author of this document