Dharampal v. State Of Haryana And Others
CWP-3785-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CWP-3785-2018 Date of Decision: March 13, 2018 Dharampal
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI
Present:
Mr. Sourabh Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Siddharth Sanwaria, DAG, Haryana, for the respondents.
ARUN PALLI, J. (ORAL) Written statement on behalf of respondents No. 1 ,2 & 4 has been filed today in the Court, which is taken on record. Copy furnished. Learned State counsel submits that, in fact, vide order dated 21.11.2017, services of the petitioner have since been terminated, and therefore, there was no occasion to grant him salary for the month of December, 2017 and January, 2018, as prayed for in the petition. Faced with this, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing substantive survives in this petition, as the petitioner shall have to question his removal/termination by assailing the order dated 21.11.2017. Disposed of as infructuous.
(ARUN PALLI) JUDGE March 13, 2018 Pkapoor Whether Speaking/Reasoned:
YES / NO Whether Reportable:
YES / NO Prashant Kapoor 2018.03.14 09:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document