High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/6478/2017disposed of

Ramesh Chander v. Punjab State Power Corp. Ltd. And ORS

2019-01-11Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi4 pages

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: - 11.01.2019 1.

CWP-6478-2017 Ramesh Chander 2.

CWP-6485-2017 Pritam Singh 3.

CWP-6490-2017 Dev Raj 4.

CWP-6513-2017 Suraj Prashad 5.

CWP-6523-2017 Jnardan Mahto

-26.

CWP-6529-2017 Dungar Ram 7.

CWP-6643-2017 Sham Singh 8.

CWP-6758-2017 Shinder Paul 9.

CWP-6763-2017 Kewal 10.

CWP-6764-2017 Hardial Singh 11.

CWP-20165-2018 Dharampal Singh

-312.

CWP-20174-2018 Jaswant Singh CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present:- Mr. Yaseen Sethi, Advocate for Mr. Harpreet Singh Jakhal, Advocate for the petitioners (in CWP-6478-2017, CWP-6485-2017, CWP-6490-2017, CWP-6513-2017, CWP-6523-2017, CWP-6529-2017, CWP-6643-2017, CWP-6758-2017, CWP-6763-2017 and CWP-6764-2017).

Mr. Brijesh Nandan, Advocate for the petitioners (in CWP-20165-2018 and CWP-20174-2018).

Mr. Parminder Pal Singh Thethi, Advocate for the respondents (in CWP-6478-2017, CWP-6485-2017, CWP-6490-2017, CWP-6513-2017, CWP-6523-2017, CWP-6529-2017, CWP-6643-2017, CWP-6758-2017, CWP-6763-2017 and CWP-6764-2017).

Mr. Arav Gupta, Advocate for the respondents (in CWP-20165-2018).

Mr. Parminder Singh-I, Advocate for the respondents (in CWP-20174-2018).

**** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (ORAL) By this common order, all the above-mentioned Civil Writ Petitions are being disposed off.

Separate replies filed on behalf of the respondents today in the Court are taken on record and a copy thereof has been supplied to counsel for the petitioners.

-4Counsel for the parties agree that the relief, which has been claimed by the petitioners for the grant of promotional increment after completion of 23 years of service, is now covered by an order passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No.1013 of 2017, decided on 29.11.2018.

Keeping in view the fact that both the parties are agreed that the present writ petitions are covered by the decision rendered in the above-mentioned writ petition, the present writ petitions are also disposed of in the same terms as CWP No.1013 of 2017, decided on 29.11.2018. ( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) January 11, 2019 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking?

Yes Whether reportable?