Gyano And ORS v. Union Of India
!
"
# $% & '( ( !)
#
#
**++$!%
,--
* !!% .) /0 . - 1. -
!
"""""""
1. -
2 #
$ %&'%('&
) *!
! + ,
- ./*
*
%
0' ***
0%&
1 +
2 '34%('(
1+
+
5 6
*
#
+
+
* +
0 *
9 00 &#
$
$ +
) *
$
5
)
:
6 * '44%('(;
7* %&4%('(
0%*
) 8
+
<*
*
* =
*
* *
*
* 7
*
*
*
& 5
*
*
' >
?
% >
*
'%= , /,%/
*
'%&1 ) ? = >
?
& )
3
0%1
*
6 >'
6 >%+ #
:
'@4%('( 96' '@4%('(96%
'@4%('(96=
) *
963 96@
) 8 *
:
1
6964
'44%('(96A
96'(
:
'B4%('( ) 8 !
96'' @ 5
6 )>'15C D E+
*
*
+
D) 4
*
*
0' %
+
A
B !
>'>%
* :
D)
'@4%('(
) *
<
$ *
!
*
*<F
! !( !
&
!($ (!$ (2,%('B/=!!34%
$
)
<
!
D)
* !
* *)D F
,
/
'( !
*
$
7
2
!
>%1+ *
*
*
>%1+ *
*
7*
%&4%('(
!
*
7
'@4%('(
*
6'(
6
*
!
*
7
#
''
'%
1+
* *
>%1+
>%
>%1+
*
'@4%('(
0
+
D 8
7 ='3
0 *#* ) *8
* **
*
9
6 >%
*
#
>%
$ *
*
6
7* :
%&4%('(
*
'@4%('( *#*) 8
7*
>%
0
* *
G 7 #
D
'34%('(+
>%
#
>%
*
*'@4%('( '=
96'
*
* 7
+
#
:
96'
'44%('(#
* 7*
*
1 68
96A 6*
'44%('(
:
96'
$
*
96A
7
$
*
$
*
D)96)'*
*
1+
* 7
* '&
6 )>'5C * *
+
'@4%('(
*
* 7
<*
6)>'
7*
*
:
#
)>'
*
D)
96)' '3
* *
1 $
:
6 # *
:
'%&1 ) '@
*
'%&1 )
*
* *
'%&1 )
* * 6
(!$ (/
,
/*
<F
6!
* 1 -We thus hold that mere presence of a body on the Railway premises will not be conclusive to hold that injured or deceased was a bona fide passenger for which claim for compensation could be maintained. However, mere absence of ticket with such injured or deceased will not negative the claim that he was a bona fide passenger. Initial burden will be on the claimant which can be discharged by filing an affidavit of the relevant facts and burden will then shift on the Railways and the issue can be decided on the facts shown or the attending circumstances. This will have to be dealt with from case to case on the basis of facts found. The legal position in this regard will stand explained accordingly." '4
) * '@4%('(
>%1+ #
:
96'
96A
+
+
$ * 7
+
$
*
'A *
'@4%('(*
*#*8 *
$
# *
0' %
*
+
*
*
<*
*
0=
*
*
'B !
:
* $ %&'%('&
#
#
E
& 7
*
H@I
J #
*
6=
:
1. -
56
#2 #
>
7E
K
E0 >
K
E0