Mohan Sarup Joshi v. State Of Punjab

CWP No.3923 OF 2018 --1--

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.3923 OF 2018 DECIDED ON: FEBRUARY 19, 2018 MOHAN SARUP JOSHI .....PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH

Present:

Mr. Ravneet Singh Joshi, Advocate, for the petitioner.

***** JASPAL SINGH, J Through instant petition preferred under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has sought issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion as Senior Assistant from 14.08.1992 as his juniors have already been given the promotion as Senior Assistant with consequential benefits. As well as to sent the revised pension case of petitioner to A.G. Punjab Chandigarh or to decide representation (Annexure P-3).

2.

At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner feels satisfied in case direction is issued to respondent to decide representation dated 18.11.2017 (Annexure P-3), within a stipulated period. 3.

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent to look into the Sonika 2018.02.19 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CWP No.3923 OF 2018 --2-- grievances unfolded by the petitioner in representation dated 18.11.2017 (Annexure P-3) and to take a conscious decision, in accordance with law, within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 4.

However, if the petitioner still feels aggrieved against any of the order(s) passed by the concerned authority, he shall be at liberty to have recourse to the other remedies available to him as well as to approach this Court.

FEBRUARY 19, 2018 (JASPAL SINGH) sonika JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable Yes/No Sonika 2018.02.19 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh