Sarabdeep Singh & ORS. v. Gram Panchayat Village Arno & ORS.

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-6686-2017 Date of Decision: August 09, 2017 Sarabdeep Singh and others .....Petitioners

Versus

The Gram Panchayat Village Arno and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR MITTAL 1.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

Yes/No 2.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No.

3.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No .......

Present:

Mr.Ishan Kaushal, Advocate for Mr.K.S.Khehar, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr.Amarjit Kaur, Advocate for respondent No.1. Ms.Ambika Luthra, Sr.DAG, Punjab.

........

SURYA KANT, J.

In view of the fact that Financial Commissioner has already decided the stay application and this Court vide a separate order of even date passed in CWP No.7019 of 2017 (Gram Panchayat Arno through its Sarpanch vs Joint Development Commissioner and others) has directed the parties to maintain status quo re: change of mutation, nothing survives in this petition on merits, which is accordingly disposed of as infructuous. ( SURYA KANT ) JUDGE August 09, 2017 ( SUDHIR MITTAL ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No Meenu 2017.08.11 11:00 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh