Lokesh v. State Of Haryana And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-21461-2022 (O&M) Date of decision: September 19, 2022 Lokesh ....Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA

Present:

Mr. Kamal Deep Sehra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pankaj Middha, Additional AG Haryana.

***** ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL) Petition herein, inter alia, is for issuance of an appropriate writ directing the respondents to appoint the petitioner as Veterinary Livestock Development Assistant. Allegedly, his claim has been rejected illegallyin a unjust manner.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that qua his grievance, though petitioner has already submitted a representation dated 06.07.2022 (Annexure P-11), but since the same is not a detailed, petitioner would be satisfied in case he is granted permission to file a detailed representation before the competent authority raising all his grievances and a decision is taken thereupon.

3.

On advance service, learned State counsel appears and also submits that a decision will be taken by competent authority, either way, by passing a speaking order, in case petitioner files a representation as aforesaid. MAHAVIR SINGH 2022.09.20 08:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

4.

Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek return by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are required.

5.

Without commenting on the merits of the case, the instant writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to look into the representation of the petitioner and pass an administrative order, in accordance with law.

6.

Let the needful be done within 6 weeks of filing fresh representation by the petitioner.

7.

Disposed of accordingly.

(ARUN MONGA) JUDGE September 19, 2022 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No