Simaranpreet Kaur And Anothers v. State Of Punjab And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH -.- CRWP-10615-2020 (O&M) Date of decision : 18.12.2020 Simaranpreet Kaur and another .....Petitioners Vs.

State of Punjab and others .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN

Present:

Mr. Jaspreet Singh Brar, Advocate for the petitioners. ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL) Heard through video conferencing.

This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking protection of life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondent Nos.4 to 6.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are major and have got married against the wishes of their parents and relatives. The copies of the Aadhaar Cards of both the petitioners have been annexed with the petition as Annexures P-1 and P2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has also shared a copy of matriculation Certificate of petitioner No.1 with the VC Coordinator on the WhatsApp group. The same be printed and retained on the record. Learned counsel for the petitioners has contended that the petitioners are receiving serious threats and apprehend grave danger to their life and liberty. The petitioners had also sent a representation dated 16.12.2020 (Annexure P-5) to the Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana and Station House Officer, Police Station - Sudhar, District Ludhiana, respondent Nos.

2 and 3, for providing adequate security. However, no action has been taken till date. The counsel for the petitioners would further contend that he limits his prayer in the present petition and would be TRIPTI SAINI 2020.12.

CRWP-10615-2020 (O&M) -2satisfied at this stage if directions are issued for deciding the said representation in accordance with law.

Notice of motion.

On the asking of the Court, Mr. V.G.Jauhar, Senior DAG, Punjab has joined the session through video conferencing and accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3. Since the matter is not being decided on merits, the service on other respondents is dispensed with. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Without expressing any opinion with regard to the veracity of the contents of the petition and the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present petition is disposed off with a direction to the Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana, District Ludhiana (respondent No.2) to consider the representation dated 16.12.2020 (Annexure P-5) and take necessary action as per law. It is, however, made clear that this order shall not, in any manner, be construed as an expression of opinion on the veracity of the statements made by the petitioners or on the validity of the marriage and shall have no effect on any other civil or criminal proceedings, if any, instituted/pending against them.

December 18, 2020 (ALKA SARIN) tripti JUDGE NOTE:

Whether speaking/non-speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No TRIPTI SAINI 2020.12.19 13:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document