Sunita Suhag v. State Of Haryana And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 7169 of 2017 Date of decision : 10.09.2018 Sunita Suhag ......Petitioner versus State of Haryana and ors.
...Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present:
Mr. R.N. Lohan, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Kiran Pal Singh, A.A.G. Haryana **** RITU BAHRI , J. (Oral) The present petition is for quashing of order dated 02.03.2017 and further prayer is for writ in the nature of mandamus for directing the respondents to keep the petitioner in service on some supernumerary post up to the age of 60 years and to release full salary along with consequential benefits. On notice, a reply dated 01.12.2017 has been filed by the respondents stating there in that petitioner has expired on 04.11.2017 (R-1) and it has been stated that the petitioner has been held entitled to salary from 23.12.2016 to 31.01.2016.
Since the petitioner expired on 04.11.2017, no further orders are required to be passed in the present writ petition. Disposed of.
September 10, 2018 (RITU BAHRI) G Arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Gaurav Arora 2018.09.10 17:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh