High Court of Punjab and HaryanaRFA/6777/2011disposed of

Balwant & ORS. v. State Of Haryana & ORS.

2015-05-25Mr. Justice Ramendra Jain2 pages

RFA No.6777 of 2011 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA No.6777 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 25.5.2015 Balwant and others ..... Appellants

Versus

State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL

Present:

None for the landowners.

Mr. Raj Kumar Makkad, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. RAJESH BINDAL, J This order will dispose of a set of appeals bearing RFA Nos.6777 to 6783, 7369 of 2011, 232 and 773 of 2012, as common questions of law and facts are involved in these appeals.

The landowners are before this Court seeking enhancement of compensation for the acquired land.

Brief facts of the case are that the State of Haryana vide notification dated 27.4.2005, issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short 'the Act') sought to acquire land situated within the revenue estate of village Ramayan, Hadbast No. 116, Tehsil Hansi, District Hisar, for construction of Hansi Multiple Channel. Notification under Section 6 of the Act was issued on 1.7.2005. The Land Acquisition Collector (for short 'the Collector') vide award dated 15.2.2006 assessed the market value of the acquired land @ ` 5,00,000/- per acre. The land owners being dissatisfied with the award of the Collector filed objections which were referred to the learned Court below. On reference, the learned Court below assessed the compensation of the acquired land @ ` 6,00,000/- per acre. Aggrieved against the award of the learned court below, the landowners are in appeal before this court.

Learned counsel for the State very fairly submitted that the issue raised in the present set of appeals is squarely covered by judgment of this Court in RFA No. 3867 of 2011-- Mohan Lal v. State of Haryana and SHARMILA 2015.06.09 15:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.

Chandigarh

RFA No.6777 of 2011 -2others, decided on 21.5.2012, vide which this Court has further enhanced the compensation for the acquired land.

Accordingly, for the reasons recorded in Mohan Lal's case (supra), the present appeals are disposed of in the same terms. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 25.5.2015 sharmila SHARMILA 2015.06.09 15:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.

Chandigarh