Davinder Singh Alias Gora v. State Of Punjab
6 IN TH HE HIGH COURT FOR THE E STATES OF PUNJAB AND HANDIGARH HARYANA AT CH -/- 1
7 6-'/.'- -/-
''' 455
'''58 "+!
!
"#$%& ' ()*+& "+! $* Mr. $ $*, ('
- -./0-/- #"
%
-/- 1 23 & " % %
)* + !5 "4
,-. /
!0'!01)1 !
!
!!! 23 )2 )0- 4 # "
!
& " "
"
&# # " 4 6#$
('
)# # #
- # # ## (3
8 $# 4# "4 - # $$ $#" 7# "4 " 9 ## 2
4 6"8 4 6
/ 9 . 4#" :
:8 #4 4 "
" "
# #" 4 -
-$ $ ; $ " $
" 4
4
-
) # #
#
< < " 4$
) # # # $
% $ 4
) # $ % + 4
(0
= # % (0
) # $+ 6# $ "!(" #8
, 4 " !
!("# (0
" $ $ # + "
(0
)
4 (0
)# # " !( " 4 6 #
$ $ 2 *
54 # !(" $
#
" . Gurap ppa Gugal and others Vs. Stat te of Mysore : 1 1969 CriLJ 826 and Shokat Ali Vs. State of Haryna : 2020(2) R RCR (Criminal) ) 339.,, while adjourning g the case to 17.10.2014 to comp plete the manda atory period of 30 days, the learn ned trial Court failed to consider r the fact that $+ " "8 # # #
# !( " . + %
!"!#$ % && , $ $ # " $
#$ # # 2 *
5 4 " #$ #
">
+ #
"
# $ " +
4 &
*5 * 5
* 5*5 4 8 $ 8 $# # $ $ .
B. : 1973 CriLJ 1368. Pawan Ku umar Gupta Vs. The State of W.B
"$# $ $# ## $ #
)*+ !5 " 4
,-. /
!0'!01)1 !!
!!! 23
)2 )0 -4 # "
#
A$# "8 4
# # $"
""
4# () #% " 4
8
7"
& 4 "
!
- 4#
6#$
8 " . (((( (7 " #8 6"
" 6 4 ? "@ = 4 & " 4
7 " (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE 6-'/.'-/-
Whet ther speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whet ther reportable Yes/No