Vmt Spinning Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Ludhiana And ORS

ITA No. 9 of 2013 -1-


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH **** ITA No. 9 of 2013 Date of Decision: 10.02.2020 VMT Spinning Co. Ltd., Ludhiana Appellant

Versus

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Ludhiana and another Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Present:

Ms. Radhika Suri, Senior Advocate with Mr. M.S. Kanda, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms. Pridhi Jaswinder Sandhu, Jr. Standing Counsel for the Revenue.

**** AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) [1] This is an appeal filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 13.07.2012 passed in ITA No.682/Chd/2007 for assessment year 2003-04.

[2] At the very outset, learned senior advocate states that questions No.(ii) and (iii) would have to be substituted with question No.(vi) of ITA No.216 of 2013 titled as Vardhman Holdings Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Range 1, Ludhiana and another and the same be disposed of in same terms. [3] Learned counsel for the Revenue could not dispute the same.

PANKAJ BAWEJA 2020.02.13 08:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Ciourt, Chandigarh

ITA No. 9 of 2013 -2- [4] Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that question No.(i) and substituted question instead of (ii) and (iii) (claimed) have been answered in ITA No.216 of 2013.

[5] In the circumstances, the appeal stands disposed of in same terms as in ITA No.216 of 2013.

[6] Since the appeal is disposed of, the pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

[AJAY TEWARI] JUDGE [AVNEESH JHINGAN] JUDGE February 10, 2020
 
  

         



    PANKAJ BAWEJA 2020.02.13 08:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Ciourt, Chandigarh