Som Bir v. State Of Haryana And Another

CWP-499-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-499-2018 Date of Decision: January 11, 2018 Som Bir

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI

Present:

Ms. Parminder Kaur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

ARUN PALLI, J. (ORAL) Notice of motion.

Mr. Hitesh Pandit, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Copies furnished.

In the nature of order, I propose to pass, no formal written statement(s)/counter affidavit(s) on behalf of the respondents are indeed necessary, at this stage. Thus, with the consent of the parties, the petition is being finally disposed of.

The Haryana Staff Selection Commission-respondent No. 2 advertised 38 posts of Station Supervisor under Category No. 22. The petitioner participated in the selection process under the Backward Class-A (BCA) Category, for, he was fully eligible therefor. He purports to have qualified the written examination. And, he was even called for scrutiny of Prashant Kapoor 2018.01.11 15:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CWP-499-2018 documents alongwith other successful candidates. However, in the final list of candidates who have been called for interview, his name and roll number is not reflected. Resultantly, he has even represented to respondent No. 2Commission, vide representation dated 04.01.2018 (Annexure P-6). But to no avail. The interviews in the concerned category is scheduled to take place on 13.01.2018.

In response, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the grievance as also the representation of the petitioner, dated 04.01.2018 (Annexure P-6), shall be considered and disposed of by respondent No. 2Commission. And appropriate orders in accordance with law shall be passed by 12.01.2018 itself, which shall be communicated to the petitioner. That being so, the petition is accordingly disposed of in the above terms. Needless to assert that in the event, the claim of the petitioner is accepted and he ought to have been called for the purposes of interview, the necessary orders in this regard shall be passed. A copy of this order be supplied to the learned counsel for the parties under the signatures of the Bench Secretary. (ARUN PALLI) JUDGE January 11, 2018 Pkapoor Whether Speaking/Reasoned:

YES / NO Whether Reportable:

YES / NO Prashant Kapoor 2018.01.11 15:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document