← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/5124/2018disposed of

Ved Parkash And ORS v. State Of Haryana & ORS

2018-03-01Mr. Justice Rameshwar Singh Malik2 pages

CWP No.5124 OF 2018 --1--

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.5124 OF 2018 DECIDED ON: MARCH 01, 2018 VED PARKASH AND OTHERS .....PETITIONERS

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH

Present:

Mr. Sandeep Thakan, Advocate, for the petitioners.

***** JASPAL SINGH, J.

Through instant petition preferred under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, petitioners have sought issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to refix the pay in terms of judgment dated 23.04.1990 in CWP-5563-A of 1989 titled as "Nitya Nand v. State of Haryana and others" (Annexure P-4) and in another judgment dated 27.07.2000 passed in CWP No.16084 of 1997 titled as "Dharam Pal Singh v. State of Haryana" (Annexure P-5) and judgment dated 08.12.2015 passed by Hon'ble Apex Court in SLP No.8661 of 2009, vide which SLP filed by the State of Haryana has been dismissed (Annexure P-6).

2.

At the very outset of the arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he feels satisfied in case a direction is issued to respondents to decide legal notice dated 25.01.2018 (Annexure P-10) in view of Sonika 2018.03.07 11:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CWP No.5124 OF 2018 --2-- judgments referred in para 1 of this order, within some time bound manner. 3.

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant petition is disposed of with the direction to respondents to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioners in legal notice dated 25.01.2018 (Annexure P-10) and to take a conscious decision in accordance with law, rules and regulations, particularly in view of judgments referred in para 1 of this order, within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

4.

However, if the petitioners still feels aggrieved against any of the order(s) passed by the concerned authority, they shall be at liberty to have recourse to the other remedies as well as to approach this Court. MARCH 01, 2018 (JASPAL SINGH) sonika JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable Yes/No Sonika 2018.03.07 11:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh