← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/789/2017allowed

Pushpa Devi v. State Of Haryana & ORS

2022-05-05Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi6 pages

   



 ! !"#$#%& ' '

($)*!+# ! # #%!, -!,$($ .  ! ,/%%0 )!,$ !$*%0!% $  

 

     

 







 

 



  !

"""

 



   !

  %% -

/   0  +&,    %   0 

% %   +    !     -% $ 2 3 454

! 6 -6%     &( '& &''7

 

&  

   

 

%. $ * -  %  0  

        % 8 9

&&'1( &':     %    

 %  - 

 -      $

% 

 

    %         $  *

<     % % -  $ 

=  % 

=  $  - %  %    

 -    -  % 

454 -  % 

-    44; 447 44: 44( 445 444 &'''

&'' 

  % +$  -  

&''1



-% $

=  $  %  % %    $  -     % % 

  

$

    %  3 -       %   $0  &'';+&''7  

''

  %   &''1 - 

$ 

 - -   % $

;

 - % -6%  



# % %$ %.    

 % + "3.

DAILY WAGE EMLPLOYEE (GROUP D):

Only such daily wage employee who have completed three year services on Group D post(s) on 30th September, 2003 and were in service on 30th September, 2003 shall be regularized against their respective Group D posts provided they fulfill the requisite qualification and were originally appointed against vacant posts, provided further that they have worked for a minimum period of 240 days in each year and if the break in service of a daily wage employee (s) has been caused for no fault attributable to him, such break period should be condoned unless it is of an extraordinary longer period. However, if the break in service has been caused due to fault of the employee like abandonment of employment, the Government may not condone the same if the period of such break is more than a period of 30 days."

$  - -     %.   

   $ -   &''1 * 

>

#



   0  

8 % $     >$ % 

>$ &''& -  /$ &''7 



>$

 &'';

#

0  

  %   %

% - $ ?   %.    %.

=    

% $    

=  $   - %   - '1

 

  

:

    - 

 

 - 

1/ '2

.1..

kanchan

 √ Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No √ Whether reportable : Yes/No