Bhupinder Kumar v. State Of Haryana And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-5220-2018 (O&M) Date of decision:- 29.05.2018 Bhupinder Kumar

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN Present:- Mr. Rakesh Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Sandeep S. Mann, Senior DAG, Haryana.

Mr. S.S. Antal, Advocate, for respondent No. 5.

* * * * AVNEESH JHINGAN, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed for setting aside the orders dated 22.03.2011 (Annexure P-2) and 13.02.2017 (Annexure P-4) respectively.

2.

The grievance raised is that the order passed by the Financial Commissioner, Haryana in a revision petition is a non-speaking order as it does not take into consideration the respective merits of the candidates and no reasons have been mentioned.

3.

The learned State counsel states that he has no objection if the said order is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the Financial Commissioner to decide the same afresh.

4.

The order dated 13.02.2017 (Annexure P-4) is, thus, set aside and the matter is remitted to the Financial Commissioner, Haryana for deciding revision petition afresh after hearing the parties and by passing a speaking order. (AVNEESH JHINGAN) JUDGE 29.05.2018 Amodh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
Amodh Sharma 2018.06.02 13:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh