High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/36812/2025disposed of

Sheela Alias Reena v. State Of Haryana

2025-07-17Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal2 pages

CRM-M No.36812 of 2025 -1- 122 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.36812 of 2025 Date of decision: 17.07.2025 Sheela @ Reena .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. GREWAL

Present:

Mr. R.K. Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner.

***

The petitioner is seeking quashing of order dated 03.06.2025 (Annexure P-2) passed by learned ACJM, Panchkula in FIR No.330 dated 03.12.2018 under Sections 406, 420, 494, 120-B IPC, 1860 registered at Police Station Chandi Mandir, District Panchkula whereby bail of the petitioner was cancelled and non bailable warrants have been issued qua the petitioner. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner could not appear before the trial Court on the date fixed as the petitioner was ill and was admitted to Yashwant Singh Parmar Medical College Nahan, Himachal Pradesh from 29.05.2025 to 07.06.2025 and to this effect, the petitioner has annexed Discharge and Follow-up card of the said College (Annexure P-3). He further states that during the aforesaid period, due to non-appearance on 03.06.2025, her bail bonds and surety bonds were cancelled and warrants of arrest were issued qua the petitioner. He further states that the case is now fixed for hearing before the trial Court on 21.07.2025. However, he submits that the petitioner is willing and Sonia Puri 2025.07.18 17:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M No.36812 of 2025 -2- ready to join the proceedings and shall appear before the trial Court as and when required. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions further submits that the petitioner undertakes to appear before the trial Court on each and every date and shall not seek any exemption for her personal appearance on any date of hearing before the trial Court. Hence, in the aforementioned facts and circumstances, the petitioner prays that directions be issued to the Trial Court that her bail application, which she would be filing on her surrender, be decided. 3.

Keeping in view the facts of the case, the service of respondent is dispensed with as it will further delay the proceedings. 4.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material placed on record.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and the prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner, this Court does not find any legitimate ground to interfere with the impugned order dated 03.06.2025 passed by learned ACJM, Panchkula. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to appear and surrender before the trial Court concerned on or before 21.07.2025 at 10.00 A.M. and file an application for bail before the trial Court and on her doing so, the trial Court is directed to consider and decide the said application on the same day, in accordance with law. 17th July, 2025 (H.S. GREWAL) Sonia Puri JUDGE Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No Sonia Puri 2025.07.18 17:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document