← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/7976/2017disposed of

Mitthan Lal And ORS v. State Of Haryana And ORS

2017-04-20Mr. Justice Arun Monga2 pages

CWP No.7976 of 2017 -1IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.7976 of 2017 Date of Decision.20.04.2017 Mitthanlal and others ........Petitioners Vs State of Haryana and others ........Respondents

Present:

Mr. Abhimanyu Antil, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL -.- AMIT RAWAL J.(ORAL) The contention of the petitioners is that in pursuance of the Resolution No.6 dated 12.08.2014 for allotment of plot as Ghade Khad, they had deposited an amount of `13,520/- vide receipt Annexure P-1. However, the said resolution was set aside by the Deputy Commissioner vide order dated 03.03.2016 (Annexure P-2) and affirmed by the Additional Chief Secretary vide order dated 16.11.2016 (Annexure P-3). Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he has submitted a representation dated 15.02.2017 (Annexure P-4) to respondent No.3 and will be satisfied if a direction is issued to the 3rd respondent to take appropriate action on the representation dated 15.02.2017 (Annexure P-4) within a stipulated period.

Without going into the merits and demerits of the claim of the petitioner, I deem it appropriate to direct the 3rd respondent-Municipal Corporation Sonepat, District Sonepat to take appropriate action on the representation dated 15.02.2017 (Annexure P-4) within a period four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and if claim of the petitioners is found appropriate and just, the amount will be refunded PANKAJ KUMAR 2017.04.21 17:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP No.7976 of 2017 -2to them forthwith.

The writ petition stands disposed of with the above direction. (AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE April 20, 2017 Pankaj* Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No PANKAJ KUMAR 2017.04.21 17:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document