← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRWP/8249/2023dismissed

Shish Pal v. State Of Punjab And Others

2024-08-28Mrs. Justice Manjari Nehru Kaul2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRWP-8249-2023 Date of decision: 28.08.2024 SHISH PAL ....Petitioner V/s STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL

Present:

Ms. Divya Gulati, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Shiva Khurmi, AAG, Punjab.

***** MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) 1.

Prayer in the instant petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life, liberty and property of the petitioner at the hands of private respondents.

2.

Learned State counsel has placed on record status report by way of an affidavit of Sh.Maninder Pal Singh, PPS Assistant Commissioner of Police, North, Amritsar on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 in Court today and at the outset drawn the attention of this Court to paragraph 6 thereof. It has been submitted by learned State counsel that there is some property dispute between the petitioner and his own son i.e. respondent No.4-Sunil Kumar; respondent No.4-Sunil Kumar is not even a resident of India but is based in Australia. It has been further submitted by POONAM RATHORE 2024.08.29 11:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CRWP-8249-2023 -2the learned State counsel that an enquiry was conducted by the official respondents and no such threat perception, as alleged, had come to light. Learned State counsel has also drawn the attention of this Court to paragraph 5 wherein it stands detailed that in fact the petitioner and the private respondents had been making complaints against each other, and on enquiry since no substance was found in the complaints other than there being a civil dispute between the parties, the said complaints were consigned to the record room.

3.

In the wake of the affidavit filed, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the instant petition. 4.

Dismissed as not pressed.

(MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE August 28, 2024 poonam Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No POONAM RATHORE 2024.08.29 11:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh