Kuldeep Singh v. State Of Punjab
CRM-M No.47502 of 2021 ...1...
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.47502 of 2021 Date of Decision: 17th January, 2022.
Kuldeep
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
(Heard through Video-Conferencing) CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA
Present:
Mr. Baldev Singh Sodhi, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Arun Kaundal, DAG, Punjab.
* * * * MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J.
(ORAL) The petitioner herein has sought the relief of anticipatory bail in the criminal case arising out of the FIR bearing No.53 dated 28.04.2021 registered at Police Station Nurpur Bedi, District Ropar, under Sections 307, 323, 324, 458, 506,148, 149 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act. Status-report filed on behalf of the respondent-State by way of the affidavit of Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sri Anandpur Sahib, District Rupnagar, as forwarded by learned State counsel to this Court through e-mail, is taken on the record.
Learned State counsel, on the instructions from ASI Ram Kumar from the above-said Police Station, apprises the Court that in compliance of the order dated 12.11.2021 as passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined in the investigation and his custodial interrogation is SEEMA SHARMA 2022.01.17 18:04 I attest to the accuracy of this order
CRM-M No.47502 of 2021 ...2...
not required and he is also not involved in any other criminal case of the similar nature.
In view of the afore-said submission as made by learned State counsel, the instant petition is allowed and the relief of interim bail, as extended to the petitioner by this Court vide the said order dated 12.11.2021, is made absolute.
However, the petitioner shall continue to join in the investigation as and when required/called upon to do so and shall also strictly abide by all the conditions as laid down in Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) JUDGE 17.01.2022.
seema Whether speaking/reasoned?
Yes Whether Reportable?
No SEEMA SHARMA 2022.01.17 18:04 I attest to the accuracy of this order