Dilbagh And ORS. v. State Of Haryana And ORS.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 05.07.2019 Dilbagh and others ....Appellant(s)
Versus
State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
Present:
Mr. Arun Jain, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate Mr. Neeraj Jain, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ajit Malik, Advocate Mr. Ashwani Talwar, Advocate and Mr. Aakash Shreedhar, Advocate Mr. Navneet Singh, Advocate Mr. Alok Jain, Advocate Mr. Manoj Yadav, Advocate Mr. R.S. Malik, Advocate Mr. R.S. Yadav, Advocate Mr. S.R. Hooda, Advocate Mr. S.P. Khatri, Advocate Mr. Virender Khatri, Advocate Mr. Gaurav Tyagi, Advocate for Mr. Ashok Tyagi, Advocate Mr. Ajit Singh Lamba, Advocate Mr. Gautam Kaile, Advocate for Mr. Ashwani Antil, Advocate Mr. Virender Rana, Advocate Ms. Parveen, Advocate for Mr. R.S. Budhwar, Advocate Mr. Praful Rana, Advocate for Mr. R.K. Arya, Advocate Mr. Rambir Yadav, Advocate Mr. Chirag Kundu, Advocate Mr. Sushil Jain, Advocate Mr. Suchin Kadyan, Advocate Mr. Ashwani Gaur, Advocate Mr. Vikram Punia, Advocate Mr. S.K. Sharma, Advocate for Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate Mr. Ramesh Hooda, Advocate Mr. Karan Singh, Advocate Mr. Rahul Vats, Advocate, for the landowners.
-2Mr. Sudeep Mahajan, Addl.A.G., Haryana.
Mr. Abhinash Jain, AAG, Haryana.
Ms. Vibha Tewari, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advocate Mr. Vishal Garg, Advocate for the HSIIDC.
***** G.S. SANDHAWALIA , J.
CM-4768-CI-2019 Application has been filed for bringing on record the legal heirs of deceased-appellant No.2 Jagdish. It is stated that the said appellant had expired on 28.12.2018 leaving behind his legal heirs as mentioned in para No.4 of the application, who are stated to be the only legal heirs of deceased appellant. It is further stated that there are no other legal heirs of the deceased appellant except ones mentioned in para No.4 of the application.
Accordingly, in view of the averments made in the application, duly supported by affidavit of Imarti widow of deceasedappellant, same is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Legal heirs as mentioned in para No.4 of the application are brought on record and permitted to pursue the present litigation only. It is made clear that the present order will not be liable to be taken into consideration in any other set of proceedings. Amended memo of parties is taken on record. Office to tag the same at appropriate place.
CM stands disposed of.
RFA No.4590 of 2012 For the reasons assigned in detailed judgment of even date
-3passed in RFA No.4101 of 2008 titled as "HSIDC (now Haryana State Industrial & Infrastructure Development Corporation) Vs. Rajesh Kumar-II & others", the present appeal is disposed of. 05.07.2019 (G.S. SANDHAWALIA) pvd JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No Whether Reportable:
Yes/No