Sham Lal v. Sumita Dawra And Others

COCP-27 774-2024 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUN NJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIG CO Da al ARH OCP No. 2774-2024 (O&M) ate of Decision: 11.12.2024 Sham La

...Petitioner

VERSUS

Sumita D Dawra and others ...Responden nts

CORAM

Present :

: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H HARKESH MANUJA : Mr. Arjun Kundra, Advocat te for the petitioner.

cate for respondent No.4.

Mr. Mayank Mathur, Advoc **** HARKES SH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the p petitioner submits that since the order pas ssed by the Writ Court has be een complied with, therefore, he does not t wish to press the present pet tition.

2.

Dismissed as not pressed .

3.

Rule discharged.

( HARKESH MANUJA) 11.12.20 sanjay JUDGE ed ?

Yes/No Yes/No Whether speaking/reasone Whether Reportable ?

SANJAY GUPTA 2024.12.12 11:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document