Rashid v. State Of Haryana And Others
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.8224 of 2017 Date of decision:21.04.2017 Rashid ... Petitioner Vs.
State of Haryana and others ... Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present:- Mr. Vimal Kumar Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied if direction is issued to respondent No.1 for taking appropriate action on the representation dated 25.12.2016 (Annexure P-5) within a stipulated period.
Without going into the merits and demerits of the matter, I direct respondent No.1 to consider the representation 25.12.2016 (Annexure P-5) served upon him by the petitioner and pass a speaking order thereon, in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. He shall also ensure that the representation is not an outcome of personal ego and decide the same in a most objective and pragmatic manner.
The writ petition stands disposed of with the above direction. (AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE April 21, 2017 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Savita 2017.04.24 10:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh