Manpreet Singh v. State Of Punjab And Others

CWP No.8242 of 2017 {1}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.8242 of 2017 Date of decision:01.09.2017 Manpreet Singh ... Petitioner Vs.

State of Punjab and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present:- Mr. J.S.Mehndiratta, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. I.P.S.Doabia, Addl.A.G.Punjab.

Mr. Tarun Seth, Advocate, for Mr. Sumit Jain, Advocate for respondent No.6.

Mr. Ankur Jain, Advocate for respondents No.7 to 9.

AJAY KUMAR MITTAL J. (ORAL) 1.

Challenge in this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for quashing the impugned order dated 18.04.2017 (Annexure P-10) issued by respondent No. 4, whereby the petitioner has been blacklisted.

2.

Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from Mr. Nirmal Singh, District Controller, Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Tarn Taran, District Tarn Taran, states that petitioner is already continuing with Savita 2017.09.05 14:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CWP No.8242 of 2017 {2} the contract in pursuance to the interim order passed by this Court. However, the order impugned dated 18.04.2017 (Annexure P-10) blacklisting the petitioner on account of being unsuccessful in employing labour at B.S.Dhillon, Rajan Bedi, Punjab Rice Land, Harsh Agro, Randhawa Foodgrain and K.D.R, shall be reviewed and in such circumstances, it was submitted that the same shall not be acted upon and is inoperative.

3.

In view of the above, writ petition has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of accordingly.

(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE September 01, 2017 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Savita 2017.09.05 14:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh