Anjali v. State Of Haryana And ORS.

Vinod Kumar 2018.03.13 10:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No.5705 of 2018 Date of decision: March 09, 2018 Anjali

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain

Present:

Mr. Narender Singh Kamboj, Advocate, for the petitioner.

***** Rakesh Kumar Jain, J.

After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances narrated in the writ petition, no case is made out for the purpose of issuing a writ in the nature of mandamus. Thus, the present writ petition is hereby dismissed. However, the petitioner, if so advised, may avail her alternate remedy elsewhere, in accordance with law.

March 09, 2018 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) vinod* Judge Whether speaking / reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No