Udham Singh v. Syndicate Bank And Others

CWP-24333 of 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-24333 of 2019 Date of decision: 04.12.2025 UDHAM SINGH .....Petitioner V/S SYNDICATE BANK AND OTHERS ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY, JUDGE Present:- Mr. Sachin Kamboj, Advocate for Mr. Vivek Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pankaj Nanda, Advocate and Mr. Deepak Jindal, Advocate for respondents no. 1 and 2. Mr. Karan Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Nitin Thatai, Advocate for respondent no. 10/DHFL. Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. **** SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE (Oral) 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that the cause raised herein has become infructuous, as the respondent-Bank has taken actual possession of the mortgaged secured asset and not the property of the petitioner.

2.

In view of above, present petition is disposed of as having rendered infructuous.

(SHEEL NAGU) CHIEF JUSTICE (SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE 04.12.2025 Kamal Gandhi Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No KAMAL GANDHI 2025.12.05 15:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document