Satish And ANR v. State Of Haryana And ORS

CWP-8444-2017 -1HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-8444-2017 Date of Decision: November 29, 2017 Satish and another .....Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR MITTAL 1.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

Yes/No 2.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No.

3.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No .......

Present:

Ms.Deepa Jain, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr.D.Khanna, Addl.AG, Haryana.

........

SURYA KANT, J.

The petitioners are residents of village Palwali Badshahpur, Tehsil and District Faridabad. They claim themselves belonging to 'Backward Classes' and living 'Below Poverty Line'. On this premise, their claim is that they are entitled to 100 sq.yards plot under the 'Mahatama Gandhi Gramin Basti Yojna' floated by State of Haryana, dated 01.02.2008 (P-1).

[2] At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the petition qua petitioner No.1 as his name does not find mention in the eligible persons. Ordered accordingly. [3] As regard to petitioner No.2, he has been found eligible and his name is stated to be at Sr.No.74 as per written statement filed by BDPO. It is further stated in the written statement that the matter regarding allotment Meenu 2017.12.05 11:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CWP-8444-2017 -2of plots is being enquired into.

[4] Having regard to the stand taken by the authorities the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the BDPO to conclude the ongoing enquiry within two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order and if petitioner No.2 is found entitled to, let the Gram Panchayat/authorities allot a plot to him as per the above-mentioned policy. Such an exercise shall be completed within two months thereafter. If still dis-satisfied, the second petitioner shall be at liberty to file an appeal before the Commissioner, Faridabad.

( SURYA KANT ) JUDGE November 29, 2017 ( SUDHIR MITTAL ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No Meenu 2017.12.05 11:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh