Yashvir Singh v. State Of Haryana
!"
#$
"%&'&#( ) * *
+, +
***"!&!&#("- ,++ +
***"'.#(/"(!
) 01 +* + +2
+2 * 415 !
$ %&'
()
* $
+,- ) !./ /0 /1 2/2%
( $$
5
6 $
# $7 %2/ !2/*( ,4 5 %!. %1& %0!
,4
6 -
$
#8*
!
"
!
#$
%
!&
!'
!%
()!)*$!
+ '
!,
+,- ) !./ /0 /1 2/2% $7 %2/ !2/*( ,4 5 %!. %1& %0!
,4
6
!&
$
-
! $
!
!%
%
,
$
%
!
20 /' 2/29
$
:
5-$
(
!9 /' 2/29
$
'
$ %&'
()
$ $$
/2 /1 2/29
% ; $ $#
*
8
$ #8
8
$ + $ 8 $
8
<
#
; $
$
$
#8
$
$
#8
$
$
$ ; $
2% /9 2/!!
+ " #$
( )8 3
" ) '29 2//. :546 ) '%/9 !..0 3
$
$#
#$
; $ < $#
=$
5
#6 8$
$
8$
$$ $
5 6 $
# $
,
$
8
5 >6 $
$
2/29
<
$ - 2/ /. 2/29
$ 4 (
$ $$
*
; $
$
=$
$
$
*
$ ?#7
,
; $ @ 74 4$ $ $
$
#
8
# 7 +$
$
,
/'
$
$
<
5 6 $
?$
,
$
#
$
# ,
(
$
?
<
># $
6
! ""#
$* ./0!%
!%
$ 12/( 3
)
* B4'%12/((05(02(6*7/) 890:/;
<
$
! %
=>
?
!%@!A!9 $ !B
4'%12:1 ')*(7:: 892(;
(26
(:2
9
3
(20
(:0!%
(26
!%B
!3 4'%12:1' :)5:)67:/ 891/01;
$
3
!'
3
$
!%
!'
$
!'
$
!'
! /6!
@ %
9!D $ A !CC
412061/(*71206 11); 7!/(/ 1 .!!!
"
!!!!'
!E
'
/1
!F /2!%D !
& '
412061 11671206 (1;
D 9! $
7!1/2 /2
./2.E
!E
!F :*!%'>B%'A9G%CG&BAB/ H 6!6*5 :2
7 .+
!
<
"
!F % <
! '
!
$%&'( ) %* ! !+ "" , $
$ /%
) !1
!0
$* 15!
!E
! E
<
!%
!+
$
!E
I
10!
%
'
/1
! '
/1
!F
8 $#
$
5
#6
<
$$
$
/'
$
$
$
2% /9 2/!!
+ " #$
( )8 3
8
,
$$ $ 8$
$
$
would be violative of his rights under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, including right to speedy trial and would, thus, also be against the principle of CBail is a general rule and incarceration is an exception"
as held by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Dataram vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another, 2018(2) R.C.R. (Criminal) 131.
Resultantly, petitioner is granted the concession of bail subject to his furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of learned trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned. The petitioner shall abide by the following conditions:-
$
$
$
$
$ D7
$ 6
#
< $
<
56
$
$ 5
$
=$
7
$
7 $
5
$
#
5
$
# $# "
$
"
<6
4$73$
8
#
#
8
#
#
$
8$ $
8$
# 4 +2
* *
AJ
+
$-
J -A
+
J -A