Om Parkash v. Central Administrative Tribunal & ORS

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-86 of 2017 Date of Decision: January 11, 2017 Om Parkash .....Petitioner

Versus

Central Administrative Tribunal and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDIP AHLUWALIA 1.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

Yes/No 2.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No.

3.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No .......

Present:

Mr.Arun Takhi, Advocate for the petitioner.

........

SURYA KANT, J.

The Central Administrative Tribunal in its judicial discretion has not granted stay to the petitioner against the order whereby his contractual appointment has been terminated. The main case is now fixed before the Tribunal on 30.01.2017. We thus direct the respondents to file their written statement within one week and the rejoinder, if any, be filed within three days thereafter so as to enable the learned Tribunal to decide the Original Application on merits on the date fixed or immediate thereafter. Disposed of.

Dasti.

( SURYA KANT ) JUDGE January 11, 2017 ( SUDIP AHLUWALIA ) meenuss JUDGE Meenu 2017.01.16 17:00 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No